![]() ![]() Similarities and differences in language use were identified in production, meaning and interpretation. ![]() A sample of al-Sabuniy’s methodology of ‘Ilm al-Tafsir from his interpretation of surah al-Fātihah in Safwat al-Tafāsīr and a sample of Fairclough’s methodology of CDA from his analysis of political discourse in A Dialectical-Relational Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis in Social Research have been selected. This textual study applies the Sunni mainstream legal theorists’ pragmatic approach and Russell’s approach in identifying elements of language use, and employs Smith’s approach in analysing elements of epistemology of language. ![]() How do these similarities occur? And what are the differences between the methodologies? The present work reports on a comparative study of the similarities and differences in language use and epistemology of language between the two methodologies. The methodology of ‘Ilm al-Tafsir and the methodology of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) highlight the similarities and differences in leveraging the text as research data beyond the level of the text’s structure, such as data on language use, to extend the elements of philosophy, such as epistemology of language. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |